阅读理解。 The garden city was largely the invention of Ebenezer Howard (1850-192
题型:江西省高考真题难度:来源:
阅读理解。 |
The garden city was largely the invention of Ebenezer Howard (1850-1928). After immigrating form England to the USA, and an unsuccessful attempt to make a living as a farmer, he moved to Chicago, where he saw the reconstruction of the city after the disastrous fire of 1871. In those days, it was nicknamed "the Garden City", almost certainly the source of Howard"s name for his later building plan of towns. Returning to London, Howard developed his design in the 1880s and 1890s, drawing on ideas that were popular at the time, but creating a unique combination of designs. The nineteenth-century poor city was in many ways a terrible place, dirty and crowded; but it offered economic and social opportunities. At the same time, the British countryside was in fact equally unattractive: though it promised fresh air and nature, it suffered from agricultural depression (萧条) and it offered neither enough work and wages, nor much social life. Howard"s idea was to combine the best of town and country in a new kind of settlement, the garden city. Howard"s idea was that a group of people should set up a company, borrowing money to establish a garden city in the depressed countryside; far enough from existing cities to make sure that the land was bought at the bottom price. Garden cities would provide a central public open space, radial avenues and connecting industries. They would be surrounded by a much larger area of green belt, also owned by the company, containing not merely farms but also some industrial institutions. As more and more people moved in, the garden city would reach its planned limit-Howard suggested 32,000 people; then, another would be started a short distance away. Thus, over time, there would develop a vast planned house collection, extending almost without limit; within it, each garden city would offer a wide rang of jobs and services, but each would also be connected to the others by a rapid transportation system, thus giving all the economic and social opportunities of a big city. |
1. How did Howard get the name for his building plan of garden cities? |
A. Through his observation of the country life. B. Through the combination of different ideas. C. By taking other people"s advice. D. By using the nickname of the reconstructed Chicago. |
2. The underlined phrase "drawing on" in Paragraph 1 probably means _____. |
A. making use of B. making comments on C. giving an explanation of D. giving a description of |
3. According to Howard, garden cities should be built _____. |
A. as far as possible from existing cities B. in the countryside where the land was cheap C. in the countryside where agriculture was developed D. near cities where employment opportunities already existed |
4. What can we learn about garden cities from the last paragraph? |
A. Their number would continue to rise B. Each one would continue to become larger C. People would live and work in the same place D. Each one would contain a certain type of business |
5. What could be the best title for the passage? |
A. City and Countryside B. The Invention of the Garden City C. A New City in Chicago D. A Famous Garden City in England |
答案
1-5: DABAD |
举一反三
阅读理解。 |
If you walk slowly through downtown Helsinki (赫尔辛基) during the day, taking in the splendid 19th century buildings, white boats and noise of passing trams (有轨电车), you will start to understand why it is called a city of two colors: white and blue. The sea is always present in Helsinki. When you take a walk over the great open space of the central square, you will hear seabirds screaming. When you take the tram, suddenly and unexpectedly, you are faced with a calm, shining blue sea. You may notice that people in Helsinki do not rush about as in other cities. Instead, they walk along the roads, politely letting other people by. A usual way to see Helsinki for the first time is to start out by boat. You will walk by the elderly women selling fish and vegetables in the market square and find yourself in front of a beautiful park. You may enjoy a pleasant walk in the park for a few hours and then take the tram. Trams are the perfect way to get around in Helsinki. Watching the old houses, parks, theatres, churches, shops, restaurants and people in the streets, you may have a slightly sad film feeling to it. The pale summer nights are another wonder in the city. Following the waterfront (滨水区) of the city after sunset, you couldn"t help stopping and listening to the sweet silence, interrupted only by the screaming seabirds and leaving fishing boats. However, in some way Helsinki is also the most modern city in northern Europe. You will surely want to visit the white Glass Palace, the modern art museum, and all those extremely popular cafes and design stores. |
1. The best way to see most of Helsinki is to go _____. |
A. by boat B. by bus C. by tram D. on foot |
2. The 19th century buildings, the white Glass Palace, popular cafes and design shops in Helsinki all show that Helsinki is _____. |
A. both splendid and traditional B. both quiet and noisy C. both historical and modern D. both old and new |
3. This passage is most likely to be found in _____. |
A. a story book B. a geography textbook C. a research report D. a travel magazine |
阅读理解。 |
|
1. What does the word "pump" mean in "He ran in every five minutes to pump me about the case"? |
A. Talk with. B. Ask for information. C. Listen to. D. Provide with evidence. |
2. When Sally says "The TV program kept pumping out commercials", she may be _____. |
A. excited B. interested C. annoyed D. worried |
3. What will the government most probably provide if it is engaged in a pump-priming program? |
A. Sums of money. B. Raw materials. C. Human resources. D. Media support. |
4. When Sylvia says "His speech was OK but it had no real punch", she thinks it was not _____. |
A. fluent and impressive B. logical and moving C. informative and significant D. interesting and powerful |
Reading comprehension. |
Human remains of ancient settlements will be reburied and lost to science under a law that threatens research into the history of humans in Britain, a group of leading archeologists (考古学家) says. In a letter addressed to the justice secretary, Ken Clarke, 40 archaeologists write of their "deep and widespread concern" about the issue. It centers on the law introduced by the Ministry of Justice in 2008 which requires all human remains unearthed in England and Wales to be reburied within two years, regardless of their age. The decision means scientists have too little time to study bones and other human remains of national and cultural significance. "Your current requirement that all archaeologically unearthed human remains should be reburied, whether after a standard period of two years or a further special extension, is contrary to basic principles of archaeological and scientific research and of museum practice," they write. The law applies to any pieces of bone uncovered at around 400 dig sites, including the remains of 60 or so bodies found at Stonehenge in 2008 that date back to 3,000 BC. Archaeologists have been granted a temporary extension to give them more time, but eventually the bones will have to be returned to the ground. The arrangements may result in the waste of future discoveries at sites such as Happisburgh in Norfolk, where digging is continuing after the discovery of stone tools made by early humans 950,000 years ago. If human remains were found at Happisburgh, they would be the oldest in northern Europe and the first indication of what this species was. Under the current practice of the law those remains would have to be reburied and effectively destroyed. Before 2008, guidelines allowed for the proper preservation and study of bones of sufficient age and historical interest, while the Burial Act 1857 applied to more recent remains. The Ministry of Justice assured archaeologists two years ago that the law was temporary, but has so far failed to revise it. Mike Parker Pearson, an archaeologist at Sheffield University, said:"Archaeologists have been extremely patient because we were led to believe the ministry was sorting out this problem, but we feel that we cannot wait any longer." The ministry has no guidelines on where or how remains should be reburied, or on what records should be kept. |
1. According to the passage, scientists are unhappy with the law mainly because _____. |
A. it is only a temporary measure on the human remains B. it is unreasonable and thus destructive to scientific research C. it was introduced by the government without their knowledge D. it is vague about where and how to rebury human remains |
2. Which of the following statements is true according to the passage? |
A. Temporary extension of two years will guarantee scientists enough time. B. Human remains of the oldest species were dug out at Happisburgh. C. Human remains will have to be reburied despite the extension of time. D. Scientists have been warned that the law can hardly be changed. |
3. What can be inferred about the British law governing human remains? |
A. The Ministry of Justice did not intend it to protect human remains. B. The Burial Act 1857 only applied to remains uncovered before 1857. C. The law on human remains hasn"t changed in recent decades. D. The Ministry of Justice has not done enough about the law. |
4. Which of the following might be the best title of the passage? |
A. New discoveries should be reburied, the government demands. B. Research time should be extended, scientists require. C. Law on human remains needs thorough discussion, authorities say. D. Law could bury ancient secrets for ever, archeologists warn. |
阅读理解。 |
The Queen"s English is now sounding less upper-class, a scientific study of the Queen"s Christmas broadcasts had found. Researchers have studied each of her messages to the Commonwealth countries since 1952 to find out the change in her pronunciation from the noble Upper Received to the Standard Received. Jonathan Harrington, a professor at Germany"s University of Munich, wanted to discover whether accent (口音) changers recorded over the past half century would take place within one person. "As far as I know, there just is nobody else for whom there is this sort of broadcast records," he said. He said the noble way of pronouncing vowels (元音) had gradually lost ground as the noble upper- class accent over the past years. "Her accent sounds slightly less noble than it did 50 years ago. But these are very, very small and slow changes that we don"t notice from year to year." "We may be able to relate it to changes in the social classes," he told The Daily Telegraph, a British newspaper. "In 1952 she would have been hears saying "thet men in the bleck het". Now it would be "that man in the black hat". And "hame" rather than "home". In the 1950s she would have been "lorst", but by the 1970s "lost"." The Queen"s broadcast is a personal message to the Commonwealth countries. Each Christmas, the 10-minute broadcast is put on TV at 3 pm in Britain as many families are recovering from their traditional turkey lunch. (传统火鸡午餐). The results were published (发表) in the Journal of Phonetics. |
1. The Queen"s broadcasts were chosen for the study mainly because _____. |
A. she has been Queen for many years B. she has a less upper-class accent now C. her speeches are familiar to many people D. her speeches have been recorded for 50 years |
2. Which of the following is an example of a less noble accent in English? |
A. "duaty" B. "citee" C. "hame" D. "lorst" |
3. We may infer from the text that the Journal of Phonetics is a magazine on _____. |
A. speech sounds B. Christmas customs C. TV broadcasting D. personal messages |
4. What is the text mainly about? |
A. The relationship between accents and social classes. B. The Queen"s Christmas speeches on TV. C. The changes in a person"s accent. D. The recent development of the English language. |
阅读理解。 |
The American newspaper has been around for about three hundred years. In 1721, the printer James Franklin, Benjamin"s older brother, started the New England Courant, and that was what we might recognize today as a real newspaper. He filled his paper with stories of adventure, articles on art, on famous people, and on all sorts of political subjects. Three centuries after the appearance of Franklin"s Courant, few believe that newspapers in their present printed from will remain alive for long. Newspaper companies are losing advertisers (广告商), readers, market value, and in some cases, their sense of purpose at a speed that would not have been imaginable just several years ago. The chief editor (主编) of the Times said recently,"At places where they gather, editors ask one another, "How are you?", as if they have just come out of the hospital or a lost law case. "An article about the newspaper appeared on the website of the Guandian, under the headline"NOT DEAD YET." Perhaps not, but the rise of the Internet, which has made the daily newspaper look slow and out of step with the world, has brought about a real sense of death. Some American newspapers have lost 42% of their market value in the past three years. The New York Times Company has seen its stock (股票) drop by 54% since the end of 2004, with much of the loss coming in the past year. A manager at Deutsche Bank suggested that stock-holders sell off their Times stock. The Washington Post Company has prevented the trouble only by changing part of its business to education; its testing and test-preparation service now brings in at least half the company"s income. |
1. What can we learn about the New England Courant? |
A. It is mainly about the stock market. B. It marks the beginning of the American newspaper. C. It remains a successful newspaper in America. D. It carries articles by political leaders. |
2. What can we infer about the newspaper editors? |
A. They often accept readers" suggestions. B. They care a lot about each other"s health. C. They stop doing business with advertisers. D. They face great difficulties in their business. |
3. Which of the following found a new way for its development? |
A. The Washington Post. B. The Guardian. C. The New York Times. D. New England Courant. |
4. How does the author seem to feel about the future of newspapers? |
A. Satisfied. B. Hopeful. C. Worried. D. Surprised. |
最新试题
热门考点