书面表达（满分25分）今年2月6日，教育部对“高中是否该取消文理分科”公开向社会征求意见。为此，某媒体做了一次民意调查，结果如图表所示。支持者（43 %）反对者

题型：不详难度：来源：

书面表达（满分25分）
今年2月6日，教育部对“高中是否该取消文理分科”公开向社会征求意见。为此，某媒体做了一次民意调查，结果如图表所示。

支持者（43 %）	反对者（50  %）	你的观点
1、减轻课业负担； 2、集中学习某种学科，成为专业人才。	1.人才培养需要广泛领域的知识； 2.现代社会的发展需要复合型人才。	。。。 。。。

请你结合图表，用英语写一篇题为“Should Science and Arts Education Be Separated?”的短文，介绍调查情况并谈一下你的看法
要求： 1.观点明确，理由充分； 
2.不要逐句翻译； 
3.字数100左右，开头已给出，不计入总词数
参考词汇: 负担－burden (n.&vt) 复合型人才－multi-skilled people                                                                                                 
The issue of separating science and arts education is getting heated up as debate spreads
across the country, which attracts tens of thousands of votes.

答案

参考范文：
Should Science and Arts Education Be Separated?
The issue of separating science and arts education is getting heated up as debate spreads across the country, which attracts tens of thousands of votes.
About 50% of the people interviewed think it unwise to get arts and science separated in high school. In their opinion, a real expert needs a wide range of knowledge. With the development of modern society, multi-skilled people are in great demand. However, another 43% of them insist that they should be separated so that students can concentrate on some subjects and become experts. Besides, they will not be overburdened as before. 
As far as I’m concerned, a comprehensive education is better than a separated one. A strong ability in both science and arts is helpful for the long-term development of individuals and the society as a whole. Worldwide, only in China science and arts are separated, which has had a bad effect on students’ sound development. It"s high time we changed this model.

解析

从所给的文字提示可以看出本文属于议论文，一般而言，议论文分为三大段：正方、反方以及作者的观点或看法。关键是应该注意语言的通顺，紧凑；还有就是书写的美观。