People have wondered for a long time how their personalities and behavior are fo

People have wondered for a long time how their personalities and behavior are fo

题型:不详难度:来源:
People have wondered for a long time how their personalities and behavior are formed. It is not easy to explain why one person is intelligent and another is not, or why one is cooperative and another is competitive. 
Social scientists are of course extremely interested in these types of questions. They want to explain why we possess certain characteristics and exhibit certain behavior. There are no clear answers yet, but two distinct schools of thought on the matter have developed. As one might expect, the two approaches are very different from each other, and there is a great deal of debate between proponents of each theory. The controversy is often conveniently referred to as “nature and nurture”.
Those who support the “nature” side of the conflict believe that our personalities and behavior patterns are largely determined by biological factors. That our environment has little, if anything, to do with our abilities, characteristics and behavior is central to this theory. Taken to an extreme,this theory states that our behavior is predetermined to such a great degree that we are almost completely governed by our instincts(本能).
Proponents of the “nurture” theory, or, as they are often called, behaviorists, claim that our environment is more important than our biologically based instincts in determining how we will act. A behaviorist, B. F. Skinner, sees humans as beings whose behavior is almost completely shaped by their surroundings. The behaviorists" view of the human being is quite mechanistic. They state that, like machines, humans respond to environmental stimuli (刺激) as the basis of their behavior. 
Socially and politically, the consequences of these two theories are far-reaching. In the US,for example, blacks often score below whites on standardized intelligence tests. This leads some “nature” proponents to conclude that blacks are genetically lower in status than whites. Behaviorists, on the contrary, say that the differences in scores are due to the fact that blacks are often robbed of many of the educational and other environmental advantages that whites enjoy, and that, as a result, they do not develop the same responses that whites do.
Neither of these theories can yet fully explain human behavior. In fact, it is quite likely that the key to our behavior lies somewhere between these two extremes and that the controversy will continue for a long time is certain. 
小题1:This passage is mainly concerned with ________.
A.relation between personality and behavior
B.relation between behavior and environment
C.different accounts of patterns of human behavior
D.different theories of the formation of human behavior
小题2:The underlined word “proponents” in Paragraph 2 means ________.
A.creatorsB.advisorsC.advocatesD.judges
小题3:In Paragraph 5, the author mainly writes about ________.
A.the considerable influence of the two theories
B.differences between the blacks and whites
C.racial discrimination in the United States
D.different responds to intelligence tests
小题4:What"s the author"s purpose in writing the passage?
A.To call our attention to the changes of human behavior.
B.To urge scientists to do more research in social science.
C.To give us a detailed explanation of human behavior.
D.To present an argument in the field of social science.

答案

小题1:D
小题2:C
小题3:A
小题4:D
解析

试题分析:本文主要讨论了人的个性和智力是先天形成的还是受环境影响的。
小题1:主旨大意题。首段首句指出作者要讨论的问题,第 2 段开始从两个方面解释 该问题,末段是总结段,由此看来,首段首句和末段首句提到的 human behavior 是本文的 中心内容,虽然文章首段第 2 句就提到 intelligent 一词, 但该句的 intelligent, cooperative, competitive 等都只是举例说明首句有关 personalities 和 behaviors 的问题, 由此可见,选项 B 并非本文主旨;作者提到两种理论是为了解释性格和行为形成的原因,并非讨论这两种理论形成的原因,因此 A和C两项均不正确。选D
小题2:猜词题。根据文章内容,我们可以判断 proponent 应指人,指这两种理论的支持者,只有 advocates“拥护者”符合这种推测,故选 C。
小题3:段落大意题:题干问第五段主要关于什么,这要看第五段的结构。第一句Socially and politically, the consequences of these two theories are far-reaching.很明心是个概括句,下面的论据是为了证明这两个理论的相当大的影响。选A
小题4:写作意图题:结合文章的首尾可知作者的写作目的是为了介绍社会科学领域的一个争论吗,答案选D
举一反三
A man sat at a metro station in Washington DC and started to play the violin; it was a cold January morning. He played six Bach pieces for about 45 minutes. During that time, since it was rush hour, 1,100 people went through the station, most of them on their way to work.
Three minutes went by, and a middle aged man noticed there was musician playing. He slowed his pace, and stopped for a few seconds, and then hurried up to meet his schedule.
A minute later, the violinist received his first dollar tip: a woman threw the money in the money box without stopping, and continued to walk.
A few minutes later, someone leaned against the wall to listen to him, but the man looked at his watch and started to walk again. Clearly he was late for work.
The one who paid the most attention was a 3-year-old boy. His mother tagged him along, hurried, but the kid stopped to look at the violinist. Finally, the mother pushed hard, and the child continued to walk, turning his head all the time. This action was repeated by several other children. All the parents, without exception, forced them to move on.
In the 45 minutes the musician played, only 6 people stopped and stayed for a while. About 20 gave him money, but continued to walk their normal pace. He collected $32. When he finished playing and silence took over, no one noticed it. No one applauded, nor was there any recognition.
No one knew this, but the violinist was Joshua Bell, one of the most talented musicians in the world. He had just played one of the most beautiful pieces ever written, on a violin worth $3.5 million dollars. 
Two days before his playing in the subway, Joshua Bell sold out at a theater in Boston where the seats averaged $100.
This is a real story. Joshua Bell’s playing in the metro station was organized by the Washington Post as part of a social experiment.
The outlines were: in a common environment at an inappropriate hour: Do we enjoy beauty? Do we stop to appreciate it? Do we recognize the talent in an unexpected situation?
One of the possible conclusions from this experience could be: If we do not have a moment to stop and listen to one of the best musicians in the world playing the best music ever written, how many other things are we missing?”
小题1:Few people stopped to listen to Joshua Bell playing because______.
A.people were in a hurry
B.they were not interested in music
C.it was too cold in the subway
D.the performance was not good enough
小题2:When children stopped to look at the violinist, their parents ______.
A.would give him some money
B.would stop to enjoy the music
C.would applaud for the performance
D.would urge them to continue walking
小题3:Joshua Bell played in the metro station in order to ______.
A.make more money
B.practice his skills in playing music
C.made an advertisement for his concert
D.find out people’s reaction under such a circumstance
小题4:The purpose of the passage is to _____.
A.set us to think about our life
B.show us how to play music
C.tell us the importance of music
D.report a subway performance

题型:不详难度:| 查看答案
A smart phone is a mobile phone built on a mobile operating system, with more advanced computing abilities than a common phone. The first smart phones enabled the users to send and receive emails. Later models added the function of portable media players, pocket video cameras, and GPS navigation units to form one multi-use device. Many modem smart phones also include touchscreens and web browsers that display web pages.
A recent report says we spend an average of two hours and 40 minutes each day looking at a smart phone. That doesn’t mean making calls, but playing phone games and browsing the Web.
Nowadays we always find people checking emails in a restaurant, taking a picture of the food when it arrives, or checking a message during a conversation instead of traditional communication. It’s no secret that our lives are being affected by our smart phones obsession.
However, this phenomenon has never been presented so vividly as in the short YouTube film I Forgot My Phone. Despite only being online for a few days, it"s already been viewed more than 10.5 million times. Whether it will be screened in the cinema remains to be seen.
Ironically, YouTube’s data show that the site gets a billion views per day from mobile devices, so a lot of those people watched it on their phones.
The short film, written by and starring actress Charlene Deguzman, shows groups of people in various social situations, the majority of whom are absorbed in their phones instead of the world around them. To a certain extent, we all do it.
小题1:People prefer a smart phone to a common one, because the latter only can help us ______.
A.check emails B.send messagesC.find the destinationD.watch a video
小题2:The underlined word “obsession” in the third paragraph most probably means “______”.
A.devotion B.contribution C.addictionD.emotion
小题3:Which of the following is right?
A.People spend as average of two hours and 40 minutes each day using smart phones.
B.The film hasn’t been put on in the cinema.
C.The film is written by an actor named Charlene Deguzman.
D.The film has already been viewed more than 105 million times in the first few days.
小题4:When the writer mentions the number of people watching the film from mobile devices in the fifth paragraph, he mainly feels ______.
A.encouraged B.depressedC.proudD.satisfied

题型:不详难度:| 查看答案
Being honest are fundamental requirements if you want to grow spiritually and follow your true destination of personal development. It"s not simply about being honest with people. While that will make you a better person and a more accepted one it"s more importantly about being honest with yourself.
Living your life honestly means that you"ve decided to live openly and to show your true self to others and that you can be relied upon to be trustworthy. On the other hand, dishonesty is all about shade and concealment and living your life in "dark corners". When you"re dishonest, it means that you remain living in the dark and cannot grow spiritually.
Honesty produces trust-trust in ourselves and in all those around us. Trust in turn produces confidence which we all need to overcome life"s problems and which also encourages us to take risks in order to achieve our goals.
You"ll have no doubt you have heard expressions such as "what goes around, comes around" and "you get back, what you give out in life" and that"s very true. If you don"t live your lives honestly, you can be assured that the people you"ll attract will turn out to be very similar to you and it"s therefore unavoidable that one day you"11 be on the receiving end of someone"s dishonest actions or words.
There may be situations where telling the whole truth causes you to bring a lot of pain on somebody else. For example, John may have told Paul that he can"t go on a weekend fishing trip with him because he has a family commitment arranged that weekend. You know differently and that the real reason John isn"t going is because he hates Paul. When Paul asks you if you know whether the reason is true, what do you say? Well, in situations like this, it"s often better to be economical with the truth. You might say that you don"t know why John can"t go or that you think he has something on that weekend." Of course, this isn"t telling the complete truth but you are sparing Paul"s feelings on something that won"t, after all, have strong influence on Paul"s future.
小题1:If you want to grow spiritually, it is best for you to______.
A.follow your destination
B.be true to yourself
C.plan your personal development
D.accept honest people as ends
小题2:The passage tells us that if you choose to live a dishonest life, you will_____.
A.suffer from dishonesty
B.become very attractive
C.influence honest people
D.have attractive friends
小题3:The example in the last paragraph is used to prove that______.
A.we should always tell the truth
B.John is not a trustworthy person
C.telling lies causes pain on someone else
D.sometimes we can"t be completely honest
小题4:What is the main idea of the passage?
A.We should be economical with the truth.
B.People can gain from dishonesty.
C.Honesty helps you develop.
D.Trust produces confidence.

题型:不详难度:| 查看答案
Most city parks are places where you can escape from big,ugly structures of metal and stone.The Manhattan High Line is different.Raised 25 feet above the ground,this massive metal structure once supported a rail line.The line opened in 1934 but it was hardly used after the 1960s,and much of it was torn down.However,one stretch remained in a region of Manhattan.The railway structure was ugly and everyone knew that at some time,it would have to be removed.
But the High Line was not destroyed.In fact.now the old rail line serves as one of the most peaceful places in the city.The idea to change the rail line into a park came from Joshua David and Robert Hammond.In 1999,they attended a community meeting to decide the fate of the High Line.David and Hammond were the only people at the meeting interested in saving the historical structure. Later on,when they asked railway officials to take them up to look at the High Line,they saw a mile and a half of wild flowers growing in the middle of the city,and they realized that the High Line had potential to become a park.There was growing interest in improving urban centers,and so the project quickly gathered funds for construction.
The first section of the High Line opened in 2009 and immediately became popular with tourists and locals alike.Each part of the park has a different atmosphere.Some areas are like balconies with wonderful city views.Other sections have wide lawns and walkways planted with wild flowers.Only the final section remains the way it has been for the last fifty years—a railway line overgrown with weeds.
小题1:What is the text mainly about?
A.A park.B.A train line.
C.City transport.D.A historical monument.
小题2:Which of the following is NOT true about the High Line?
A.It is above ground level.B.Only part of the line remains.
C.It is now a popular park.D.Trains still use the line.
小题3:Why did David and Hammond want to save the High Line at first?
A.They thought it would make a good park.
B.They wanted to reopen the train line.
C.They thought it had historical value.
D.They were interested in improving the city.
小题4:Why were people easily persuaded by David and Hammond’s idea?
A.They wanted to make cities nicer places.
B.They wanted to see the wild flowers too.
C.They realized the High Line was important.
D.They knew that funds were available.
小题5:We can infer from the last paragraph that the park is ______________.
A.popular with touristsB.similar to what it used to be
C.various in its design D.1ike natural countryside

题型:不详难度:| 查看答案
How far would you be willing to go to satisfy your need to know? Far enough to find out your possibility of dying from a terrible disease? These days that’s more than an academic question,as Tracy Smith reports in our Cover Story.
There are now more than a thousand genetic(基因的)tests,for everything from baldness to breast cancer,and the list is growing.Question is do you really want to know what might eventually kill you? For instance,Nobel Prize-winning scientist James Watson,one of the first people to map their entire genetic makeup, is said to have asked not to be told if he were at a higher risk for  Alzheimer’(老年痴呆症).
“If I tell you that you have an increased risk of getting a terrible disease,that could weigh on your mind and make you anxious,through which you see the rest of your 1ife as you wait for that disease to hit you.It could really mess you up.”Said Dr.Robert Green,a Harvard geneticist.
“Every ache and pain,”Smith suggested,could be understood as“the beginning of the e nd.”“That’s right.If you ever worried you were at risk for Alzheimer"s disease,then every time you can’t find your car in the parking lot,you think the disease has started.”
Dr.Green has been thinking about this issue for years.He led a study of people who wanted to know if they were at a higher genetic risk for Alzheimer’s.It was thought that people who got bad news would,for lack of a better medical term,freak out.But Green and his team found that there was “no significant difference”between how people handled good news and possibly the worst news of their lives.In fact,most people think they can handle it.People who ask for the information usually can handle the information,good or bad,said Green.
小题1:The first paragraph is meant to .
A.ask some questionsB.introduce the topic
C.satisfy readers,curiosity D.describe an academic fact
小题2:Which of the following is true of James Watson?
A.He is strongly in favor of the present genetic tests.
B.He is more likely to suffer from Alzheimer"s disease.
C.He believes genetic mapping can help cure any disease.
D.He doesn’t want to know his chance of getting a disease.
小题3:According to Paragraphs 3 and 4,if a person is at a higher genetic risk,it is .
A.advisable not to let him know
B.impossible to hide his disease
C.better to inform him immediately
D.necessary to remove his anxiety
小题4:The underlined part“freak out”in Paragraph 5 is closest in meaning to .
A.break downB.drop outC.leave offD.turn away
小题5:The study led by Dr.Green indicates that people .
A.prefer to hear good newsB.tend to find out the truth
C.can accept some bad news D.have the right to be informed

题型:不详难度:| 查看答案
最新试题
热门考点

超级试练试题库

© 2017-2019 超级试练试题库,All Rights Reserved.